These cuts aim to decrease government spending; Fox news host jessica tarlov criticized elon musk for getting involved in congress’ spending bill deliberations—and took particular umbrage at the fact that musk and donald trump’s dramatic However, they have raised alarms about their potential to hinder scientific progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating various cancers.
Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin talks about cancer diagnosis and the
Republican congressman mike flood was asked by a constituent at a town hall in columbus, nebraska, about his support for cuts to public health research after his wife had breast cancer.
“these cuts are a major hurdle to moving cancer research forward,” says selma masri, associate professor of biological chemistry at the uc irvine school of medicine.
Masri’s research is tackling colorectal cancer, a disease that’s on the rise among young people, for reasons that scientists and clinicians don’t yet understand. As the halls of congress resonated with the sound of standing ovations for the passing of the gabriella miller kids first research act 2.0, it highlighted the strength and resolve of those fighting for our youngest cancer patients. A specific cut exceeding $1 billion, directly affecting cancer research programs. These cuts aim to decrease government spending;
However, they have raised alarms about their potential to hinder scientific progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating various cancers. Medical research labs brace for possible funding cuts that could disrupt their work. February 24, 2025 5:27 pm et. Rob stein medical researchers brace for ripple effects from cuts in nih funding.
21, 2025, the incoming trump administration imposed a communications freeze on u.s.
Health agencies until a presidential appointee could review them. When congressmen are quizzed on cancer research cuts, they must justify their positions and provide evidence to support their decisions. This accountability ensures that funding decisions are made in the best interest of the public and align with broader health goals. Mark vieth was stunned when he saw the numbers.
Vieth coordinates the defense health research consortium, which advocates for a pentagon program that has long received about $1.5 billion a year Trump’s cuts to medical research are deep, vast and seemingly executed without any review of whether the studies in question are effective. Gone is a $5.3 million federal grant to support Republican congressman mike flood was asked by a constituent at a town hall in columbus, nebraska, about his support for cuts to public health research after his wife had breast cancer.
Why were several bipartisan provisions funding pediatric cancer research cut from the latest congressional spending package?
Here’s what you should know. Stein talked to nancy goodman, the founder and executive director of kids v. A number of spending provisions were cut from the new bill, including any language about the gabriella miller kids first research act. In fact, the new bill had no mentions of funding for cancer
— a charlotte family whose son was diagnosed with cancer at just 3 years old is getting ready to go back to washington, d.c. To once again fight for pediatric cancer funding. — a charlotte family whose son was diagnosed with cancer at just 3 years old is getting ready to go back to washington, d.c. To once again fight for pediatric cancer funding.
We were so close to an epic year for childhood cancer.
We had six bills that were in the end of year budget. But at the ‘ninth’ hour all childhood cancer bills, along with many other bills, were stripped. As congress reconvenes, your voice matters more than ever. Your members need to hear from you that these bills must pass.
